Saturday, August 15, 2020

Wilmington's Lie: The Murderous Coup of 1898 and the Rise of White Supremacy by David Zucchino

 Reconstruction ended in North Carolina in 1877. In less than ten years, Wilmington, the largest city in the state had become something unique - a place where blacks and whites lived side-by-side, creating a prosperous community with a growing middle class. By the 1890s Wilmington was an example of what things could be like anywhere in the United States. The so-called Fusionist government of Republicans and Populists seemed to ensure that things were just beginning. There were black aldermen, police officers and magistrates. Black men owned successful businesses. There was a black-owned newspaper. Wilmington was a great place for anyone, regardless of the color of your skin, to live. But there was darkness below the surface - resentment and hatred that had been simmering since 1865, and unless you were a part of the wealthy and powerful white upper class you would have had no idea that a revolution was about to take place. 

Wilmington had started the Reconstruction Era heading in the right direction. When other Southern cities were seeing the rise of groups like the Ku Klux Klan, a former escaped slave named Abraham Galloway decided that was not going to happen in his town. Galloway had been a Union spy during the Civil War, and he was currently serving as a state senator, and was a leader in the fight for black rights in eastern North Carolina. He formed a black militia and ran the Ku Klux Klan out of his town in 1868. His courage and determination contributed to Wilmington becoming a unique experiment for nearly 30 years before it would all come crashing down. 

When black men won the right to vote in North Carolina in 1868 about 80,000 of them registered to vote, and became active in the politics of North Carolina. But by 1900 two white supremacy campaigns had cut that number down to only 15,000 in the entire state, and it's like that less than half of that number actually voted that year. For the first time since the end of the Civil War, not a single black man was elected to the North Carolina house or senate in the 1900 election. After a generation of freedom and liberty, the time of Jim Crow had arrived. 

By 1900 white supremacist Democrats had seized control of North Carolina's largest city, its capital, the legislature, the governor's mansion and one of the US Senate seats. Black were thrown out of the voting booth and public office. Segregation was now the law of the land. And to guarantee that all of this would continue, the most influential newspaper in North Carolina regularly published its propaganda of the glories and benefits of white rule. 

The Revolution of 1898 in Wilmington had proven that white's could beat down the black vote (both literally and figuratively), and that they could defeat black office holders through a campaign of terror, violence and make it all nice and legal through legislation. And to make it all even better it had shown that the Federal government was either powerless or reluctant to do anything about it. The success of the Wilmington 1898 campaign led to the establishment of North Carolina's first Jim Crow laws, and it encouraged other southern states to follow - Alabama in 1901, Virginia in 1902, Georgia in 1908, and Oklahoma in 1910.

It is disturbing how quickly these changes took place. In 1896 there were 126,000 black voters in the state of North Carolina, in 1902, just four years after the Wilmington Revolt, there were only 6,100. It would not be until the 1950s before blacks would vote in large numbers again. 

Wilmington, NC, went from being a mecca for blacks - a place where they could live in safety, prosper and own property and businesses, live in the same neighborhoods as whites - to being a citadel of white supremacy. The events of 1898 forever destroyed the black population and culture of the city as well. The 1900 census records show that Wilmington was 49% black, and it would go down from there. As recently as 2018, blacks only made up 18.3% of the population. 

You would think that such a tragic event would be well-known throughout the Carolinas, but despite having been a history nerd since I was 8, growing up in South Carolina, just to the southwest of Wilmington, and spending almost my entire adult life in North Carolina, I had never heard of this until 2006. 2006 was the year that the North Carolina state legislature concluded its six year long investigation into the events of Wilmington. And I'm not a lone in my lack of knowledge of this tragedy. Most people who were ever taught about it in school were told a myth about 1898, and North Carolina textbooks have spent the last 120 years ensuring that that is the myth that endures and would be passed down to each new generation of kids. For many years the state produced two separate textbooks - one for white-dominate schools, and another for black-dominate schools. It wasn't until 1951 before any historians in North Carolina would dare to challenge the narrative, but since that was done by a black woman, no one took her seriously. 

This is why I think Wilmington's Lie is so important. I think everyone who has lived or currently lives in the Carolinas should read this book. No matter where in the United States you live, this is an important book because it tells of the beginning of a terrible era in our history.

Recently there has been a lot of discussion over Tulsa, Chicago and other 'race riots', and that is good, but Wilmington is only referred to in passing at best. I think it is doubtful that these other events would have happened or been as horrific if not for the 'success' of Wilmington. Jim Crow came into being in Wilmington, and swept across the Carolinas and the rest of the South and the entire United States.

David Zucchino has put together a cohesive narrative of the events leading up to, during, and after November 1898. He explains the causes, tells the horrific actions, and the tragic aftermath. And he manages to do all of this in a very readable way. This is not a happy story. There is no satisfying conclusion. This is a heavy book in that it deals with a dark, disturbing series of events.

It's really a fast-paced narrative. The only reason it took me about 2 months to read was because my library loan expired and I had to wait a month to get it back.

Thanks for reading.

Skald Wizard


And Now for Something Completely Different

      It's been nearly four years. I'm not sure why I lost interest in this. Maybe it was depression. Maybe it was life. A lot has changed since December 2016 when I made my last post on this blog. As a result, I have renamed the blog to correspond with my larger interests and to associate it with my reading Twitter account. So the Reading Sith/Darth Baptist Reads blog is now the Skald Wizard. You can follow said Twitter account here, @SkaldWizard. The email address will remain the same, darthbaptist@gmail.com, because I don't want to set up another email, I have too many of those already. I'll also connect by GoodReads account in here at some point because my GoodReads reviews may not be the same as what I post here about books.

Welcome to the Return. Welcome to the Regeneration. Welcome to the Reading Revolution. See what I did there?


Thanks for reading,

Skald Wizard

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

UNCHURCHING: CHRISTIANITY WITHOUT CHURCHIANITY

I just finished reading Unchurching by Richard Jacobson. When I say 'just', I mean within the last 60 minutes.  So this one is really fresh on the brain.
     There is a lot I liked about this book.  The author is absolutely correct in stating that there is something seriously wrong with the way most American Christians do church.  The megachurch model that many attempt to follow is seriously flawed and continues to do more harm than good.
     One of the biggest issues Jacobson points out is that most churches fail on the community part.  And he's right.  We come up with so many different ideas, plans, programs and gimmicks to improve community within our churches, yet none ever seem to work.  Some make things worse.  He also points out that few churches are even set up to be communities where all believers are able to share and use their specific spiritual gifts.  Once again, I can only nod my head and agree.  It is sad, but we chase more after the large crowds rather than focusing on building up and maturing a group of believers.
     Churches have also become little more than corporations.  Many have gone to the extent in order to protect themselves by accepting the US governments official acknowledgement as a 501(c)3 corporation.  Something I'm completely against.  But, hey, what does minimal government Sith lord know about that danger?
     Bottom line: we are doing church wrong.  Church has become a shadow of what she should be.  So what are the solutions, if any?  Jacobson prefers a non-church, or house church that is nothing like church solution.  But, I don't think that is the answer, either.
     All tradition is not bad.  When we forget the purpose of a tradition and only focus on mindlessly repeating that tradition for its own sake, it ceases to be tradition and becomes empty ritual.  When tradition serves a purpose, and people are continually reminded of its importance and purpose, then tradition is good.  Yes, a lot of our so-called traditions are worthless and should be down away with, but not all.
     Too often, instead of being a truly local church with its own uniqueness and tradition, we attempt to copy and model our local assembly of believers after something other megachurch outfit.  This needs to stop.  It doesn't help you, or the people that attend with your.  It does not build up and mature believers.
     Yes, we need to get back to true community of believers, but not to the extent where we do little but create an echochamber with little to no contact with those outside the church.  There is a great advantage in living in communities where we are surrounded by unbelievers: we have the opportunity to be in contact with them and reach out to them with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
    I think UNCHURCHING is an important book.  Pastors, elders, deacons, and other church leaders need to read it and take a good look in the mirror.  What are we doing wrong?  How can we fix it?  You may not like or agree with everything Richard Jacobson has to say, but you need to read it and figure out what changes you need to make as an individual believers as well as a church.

The Reading Sith

Sunday, March 6, 2016

The Force Awakens

SPOILERS WARNING: IF YOU HAVE NOT WATCHED EPISODE VII OR READ THE BOOK, GO AWAY, OR I SHALL TAUNT YOU ANOTHER TIME!

Has it really been this long since I've posted?  Wow.  I have had another post to make, but I seem to have lost it.  The manuscript is around here somewhere, who knows what I've done with it.  Well, before I forget what this one is about, let's get on with it.

Before I talk about the book, let me say this: I have now watched Star Wars Episode VII twice now.  Once it comes out on DVD, I will probably rack up a few more viewings.  The first time it was pure enjoyment, living the moment of watching THE Star Wars movie that I had been waiting 12 years to see.  The second time I watched to pay attention to the details, the clues, the things you don't catch in the first go around.

So, on to the novelization of the movie.

I'll admit it.  I was disappointed when I found out that Alan Dean Foster was writing the novel version.  No disrespect to Mr Foster intended.  He has had quite the career writing scifi and fantasy novels that has made him quite successful.  But, I've never cared for anything he has written.  But, I was pleased with his treatment of THE FORCE AWAKENS.
     Once I decided that I was going to enjoy, and I mean enjoy the book, I started looking out for hints and clues.  Hidden messages that were not given in the movie, or maybe were cut out due to time constraints.  Honestly, the way a few scenes were cut ended up creating more questions than I think were originally intended, and personally I think that is great!  It has driven much speculation, fan theories, podcasts and YouTube videos.  No answers were provided in the book.  A few curiosities, and a little bit more head scratching.
   
REY
We still don't really know WHO she is.  I still think she is Luke Skywalker's daughter, but who really knows.  A few clues are dropped.  During the fight scene in the frozen forest of Starkiller Base, Kylo Ren responds interestingly when the Skywalker lightsaber zips past him into the hands of our illustrious heroine.  "It IS you."  Who? WHO?!  Well, that's just it.  Only Kylo knows.
     When Supreme Leader Snoke orders General Hux to get the wounded and thoroughly beaten Kylo Ren he tells Hux that Ren was "right about the girl."   Right about what?  Again, we were never told.  This conversation between Ren and Snoke was not given to us.

SNOKE
We are not given any more information about him, either.  Although, I did find the description of the Supreme Leader absolutely fascinating.  I think it has some hints towards his identity that will only make sense when we learn who he is.

MARTHA JONES
When watching the movie both times, I wondered, "Hey, what's Martha Jones doing there?  Is she a member of the Senate of the New Republic?"  I know, she's not Martha, but the book tells us that the character portrayed by Freema Agyeman in the movie was a special envoy sent by General Leia Organa Solo to the New Republic to warn them that the First Order was every bit of dangerous as she had been warning.  So what does that mean?  The book answered ONE of my questions!

It was nice to be able to read the novel after having watched the movie twice.  It helped a lot of things to stick out to me better.  The book does tell us what happened to Poe Dameron after the TIE fighter crashed on Jakku, and how he got off planet.  But I don't believe it.  I'm still holding to my pet theory that he is a First Order plant.  He's a bad guy.  He's Supreme Leader Snoke!  Just kidding.  He is a bad guy though.  Trust me.

Thanks for reading,

Darth Baptist.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Heir to The Jedi

I continues my Star Wars run with another more recent book, Heir To The Jedi by Kevin Hearne.  This book also falls into the new timeline category, though not necessarily part of the storyline.  I guess it's going to be whatever the movie/tv show franchise runners decide they want to use.  Anyhow.  This book as released way back in March 2015.
    HTTJ is all about Luke Skywalker, and that's why I decided to give it a chance.  It's been a long time...honestly I can't remember the last time....a book was written that was solely about Luke.  And it's the Luke that's in between the events of A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back.  It's nice to get a fresh look at him at this point.  He still doesn't know where he fits in all of this.  Is he really supposed to be a Jedi?  His abilities and powers in the Force are extremely limited.  He hasn't even been talking to a dead guy yet.  Ole Ben hasn't even bothered to whisper in his ear since he blew up Death Star 1.0.  The Luke we see is very young, and that's something we haven't seen a long time.
     This book is also told in the first person, all through Luke's eyes.  That made me skittish at first.  I rarely like first person books.  It's creepy and limited.  But, a few people manage to pull it off.  Hearne did, and did it well.  There is not flashing forward to when Luke knows better, and then flashing back to the real story.  Instead, we just move through the story as Luke tells it to us.
     This was a lot like how George Lucas originally envisioned Star Wars as The Adventures of Luke Skywalker.  Going on an adventure with the future Jedi.  And in case you're wondering, yes, R2-D2 is by his side the whole way.

Thanks for reading,

Darth Baptist

Friday, September 11, 2015

Lords of the Sith

I know, it's been a while since I've posted anything.  I've been busy being lazy.  That's partially true.  I've been preparing for a new Autumn Bible study that I'll be teaching, and that has included reading about four books at the same time, writing notes, and turning that into complete written lessons.  So, yeah, busy.  The lazy part is, I haven't done much reading of anything else.  I have listened to a bunch of podcasts though.  Go brainpower!

Anyhow, I just finished reading one of the newer Star Wars books that have come out as part of the all new Expanded Universe as mandated by Disney.  Several have come out already, several more are slated to arrive before the big day in December.  I decided to give this one a shot.  Oh, in case you didn't read the title, it's Lords of the Sith by Paul S. Kemp.  I read it, enjoyed it, mostly liked it, and that's about it.

OK, since this is about what I read, here's what I thought about it.  Pay attention my two readers.

This book was promoted as a look into the Emperor and his best bud, and everybody's favorite villain, Darth Vader.  The cover art even sports the Emperor sparking off a few bolts of force lightning beside Vader holding his ignited light saber.  Oh, and a few AT-ATs in the background for good measure.  Why, I don't know.  That wasn't a scene in the book.  Unless aliens abducted me and I'm missing some time.
     We did gain some insights into the relationship, described by Palpatine to Vader as being symbiotic, between the two greatest Sith lords of all time.  But...the book really isn't about them.  And that's my beef.  It's well-written, the story moves at a great pace, but it is really about Twi'lek rebels and their plot to kill the Emperor and his pet monster.
     The Emperor manages to continue to guard his true identity from everyone, except those he intends to obliterate.  Old Palpatine really comes off as a disturbing character.  I like the way Palpatine is treated in the book.  It's probably the best version of him that we have seen since Return of the Jedi.  But, then I'm very biased.
     We are shown a tormented and haunted Vader who is still coming to grips with the person he has become.  He appears powerful, lethal and amazing.  Of course, Vader is always amazing.  Except in Revenge of the Sith.  That never happened.
     I just wish we had been given more of Palpatine-Vader 2015 and less of the rebels.  I don't care about the rebels.  I wanted and had hoped to see more of the two Sith, and maybe gained some insights as to why Vader continued to serve the Emperor until he finally tossed his wrinkled old behind down the core shaft above the moon of Endor.

All in all, I really enjoyed this book.  It doesn't make my list of the best Star Wars books, but it does go into the good list.

Thanks for reading.

Darth Baptist

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

The Hobbit

It's been a while since my last post.  Hopefully, I can get back in the groove and make more regular posts.  Sometimes, even with a blog that's only read by my wife and the cat, you're just not motivated to write.  Well, there's my excuse.

For the last few weeks I've been re-reading JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit.  Among other books, but this post isn't about those, it's about the little book that started it all.  
     I'm trying to remember how many times I've read the grand adventure of Bilbo Baggins.  I believe this is the third time all the way through.  Numerous times reading portions of it.  I'm really a latecomer to the world of Tolkien.  Tolkien and CS Lewis were neo-pagans and their works were to be avoided.  I'm not kidding.  I was really told that.  I'm pretty certain it would have garnered me some kind of disciplinary action, if not the boot, in the fundamental Baptist schools I attended.  But, let's save that nonsense for another time.  As a result, I didn't discover Tolkien until after The Fellowship of the Ring movie came out.  On DVD.  Once I watched, I was hooked.  The first time I read The Hobbit was 12 years ago.   
     Besides loving the story, and Tolkien's work, this current reading was prompted with my discovery of The Tolkien Professor podcast.  Some of the first episodes of the podcast are lectures on The Hobbit, so I decided now was as good of a time to read it again.  As I have been reading through, then I have been listening to the corresponding lectures.  If you would like to know more information about the Tolkien Professor podcast, you can click the link above or follow him on Twitter @tolkienprof. He also has another website, The Mythgard Institute, where courses on Tolkien studies are offered.  Both locations and podcasts have greast information, and I think will be enjoyed by any Tolkien enthusiast.

Some books and authors i can enjoy and read one time.  It is rare that I can read over and over again the same book.  Tolkien is one of those select few.  Several things always strike me about Tolkien's main character in The Hobbit.  Here are my thoughts, in really no particular order.

1. Bilbo is me.  There is nothing special about him.  He has no powers, abilities or anything else that makes him unique.  He is ordinary, loves ordinary, and just wants to be left alone.  Of course several "coincidences" take place - he meets a wizard, finds a magic ring - that radically change him.

2. Bilbo goes from being controlled by his circumstances to taking charge.  Especially in the Spiders episode in Mirkwood.  As the Tolkien Professor points out, Bilbo goes from being in the Darkness of Mirkwood to actively fighting back against it. 

3. Sometimes Bilbo's pride gets the best of him.

4. Most of the time Bilbo always underestimates his worth and contribution.  

5. Bilbo was able to play a very important part in something far greater than he could ever imagine.

Those are my thoughts for now.  

Thnaks for reading.

Darth Baptist